SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SOME NEW NITRONES DERIVATIVES AND SCREENING THEIR BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES

 

Jihad Haji Mohammed1, Nabaz Abdulmajeed Mohammad Salih2*

 

1,2 Dept. of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Soran, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

(jhm020h@chem.soran.edu.iq, nabazsalih82@gmail.com)

 

 

Received:5 Mar..,2023 /Accepted: 15 Mar.,2023/Published:8 Apr.,2023      https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2023.11.2.1149


 

ABSTRACT:  

Synthetic approached towards the synthesis of some novel nitrones derivatives have been started with reduction of nitrobenzene derivatives as starting material bearing electron withdrawing and electron donating groups to corresponding phenylhydroxylamine in presence of zinc dust as reducing agent in aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl). The prepared phenylhydroxylamine derivatives were reacted with different substituted benzaldehydes to give the target derivatives of nitrone. The structures of the synthesized nitrones were characterized by spectroscopic methods FT-IR, 1H-NMR and 13C NMR. Finally, the newly synthesized compounds were screened for their microorganism activities at different concentration, and inhibited growth of Escherichia coli (E. coli) Gram negative, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) Gram positive, and fungi (candida albicans).

KEYWORDS: Phenylhydroxylamines, Nitro Compound Derivatives; Electron Withdrawing Groups; Electron Donating Groups Biological active compounds;                                                                                                                                                       

 


INTRODUCTION

The name of nitrone, which is abbreviation for nitrogen ketone, was proposed by P. Fieffer in 1916 to emphasize the similarity of these compounds to ketones. The reason for these similarities was the mesomeric effect, which was similar in both nitrones and ketones. The polarization of nitrones depends on the substitutions in their structures. The presence of different types of R, X or Y substitutions can change their polarity (Delpierre & Lamchen, 1965; Ferraz et al., 2017) (scheme 1).

 

Scheme 1- General structure of nitrones (a and b) and ketones (c and d)

 

They are important substances that are widely used in organic synthesis. These substances are also important synthetic intermediates. Several nitrones have been found as essential components in the structure of important drugs (Cai et al., 2021; Salman & Majeed, 2013; Thakur et al., 2021). These compounds have an important role in trapping free radicals in the body (Besson et al., 2019; Deletraz et al., 2020; Floyd et al., 2002; Janzen & Blackburn, 1968; Jung et al., 2021). In addition, they have been used in intermolecular cycloadditions and 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions that were converted to isoxazolidines by reaction with alkenes (scheme 2) (Mutlaq et al., 2021).

 

 

 


Scheme 2- Nitrone reactions in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition and radical spin trapping

 


Their activities against bacteria and fungi are interesting. They also have used as anticonvulsant and anti-tuberculosis (Al Adhreai et al., 2022; Ibrahim et al., 2012; Salman, 2019).

Various methods have been used for the synthesis of nitrone derivatives (Murahashi & Imada, 2019), but their preparation by condensation reaction between derivatives of N- monosubstituted hydroxyamines and different substituted aldehydes or ketones is the most common method (Mahieddine et al., 2016; West & Davis, 1989).

The aim of the present study includes the synthesis of some new biologically active nitrone derivatives, because, the development of novel antimicrobial drugs is still in demand as there is increasing resistance of microorganisms to currently available antimicrobial drug.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The substances and solvents used in this study as well as the characterization were as follows:

NH4Cl, sodium sulphate anhydrous and zinc dust (SDFCL), diethyl ether (Scharlau), ethyl acetate (Licrosolv), ethanol (Hongwell), and all aldehyde and nitro compounds were obtained from commercial lab in China. All materials and solvents were utilized without purification.

The progress of the reactions and purity of the synthesized nitrones were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) plate (60F-254-Buchs, Switzerland) in which the aluminum plate was pre-coated with silica gel. Ethyl acetate and toluene (3:1) were used as the developing solvent, and the results were observed by UV light.

1H-NMR and 13C NMR characterization were done by 500 and 126 MHz (Ascend) respectively in Kurd Central Research Facilities (KCRF) in Iran. FT-IR spectrometer was determined by Shimadzu, KBr disk in Salahaddin University-Erbil. Melting points were also measured in Salahaddin University-Erbil by Stuart Scientific melting point apparatus (SMP3).

2.1.     Synthesis of phenylhydroxylamine derivatives

All procedures were modified and derived from (Mahieddine et al., 2016; West & Davis, 1989).

In a (500 mL) beaker was added (0.033 mol) of substituted nitrobenzene to (240 mL) distilled water, then added (0.087 mol) of Zn dust and stirring for (20) minutes. The temperature was in the ranges of (60-65) °C. At the end of 20 minutes, the solution was stirred for another 15 minutes. The mixture was filtered and washed with hot distilled water. The filtrate was supersaturated with NaCl and kept in an ice container for 2 hr in a dark place, then extracted with (3*70 mL) of diethyl ether.

Diethyl ether part dried with sodium sulphate anhydrous, and then evaporated to obtain the desired corresponding phyneylhydroxylamine. The product was unstable and was put directly into the next reaction.

2.2.     Procedure A: Synthesis of Nitrone (N1-N8)

In a (50 mL) round bottom flask, a mixture of (0.0046 mol) of phenylhydroxyamine derivatives and (0.0046 mol) of one of the substituted benzaldehydes in (15 mL) of the pure ethanol was refluxed for 2-3 hr in the range of (50-55) °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC plate. Then the mixture was stirred at r.t in the dark for 18 hr. The desired product (figure

1), was filtered, recrystallized with ethanol, and then washed with diethyl ether.



 

Figure 1: Structure of synthesized nitrones (N1-N8)


 


2.3.     Procedure B: Synthesis of nitrone (N9)

In a (100 mL) conical flask, (0.0046 mol) of 4-nitrobenzyl bromide with (35 mL) of ethanol 85% and (0.0046 mol) of NH4Cl were mixed. The temperature was set in the range of (7-10) oC, and then (0.0184 mol) of zinc dust was added gradually over 2 hr with stirring. After the addition was complete, the mixture was filtered and 3-methylbenzaldehyde was added to the filtrate and then refluxed in the range of (50-55) oC. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC plate, and after 2 hr the mixture was stirred overnight in the dark at r.t. The desired nitrone (figure 2) was filtered, and then recrystallized with ethanol and washed with diethyl ether.

2.4.     -(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N1)

White crystal, m.p= 140-141 0C, yield= 65%, Rf= 0.64

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3099.61 (Ar-H) stretching, 1577.77 (C=N), 1463.97-1546.91 (C=C), 1068.56 (N+-O-), 761.88 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.3701(s, 1H, H-C12), 7.9306 (s, 1H,  H-C5), 7.9266 (d, 1H, H-C2), 7.8962 (d, 1H, H-C1), 7.4748-7.6387 (m, 5H, H-C16, H-C15 and H-C17, H-C14 and H-C18) H-C15 and H-C17 have a same chemical shifting, 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 147.79, 134.82, 134.17, 133.32, 131.51, 130.77, 130.17, 129.25, 128.77, 123.93, 120.81.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2Structure of N-(4-(bromomethyl) phenyl)-1-(p-tolyl) methanimine oxide

 

2.5.     N

2.6.     N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(p-tolyl)methanimine (N2)

White, m.p = 165-167 0C, yield=56.0 % , Rf = 0.61

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3099.61 (Ar-H) stretching, 2835.66 aliphatic (C-H), 1575.84 (C=N), 1544.98-1415.75, (C=C), 1070.49 (N+-O-), 725.23 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.2898 (s, 1H, H-C12), 8.0305-7.7869 (m, 4H, H-C14, H-C15, H-C17, H-C18), 7.7548-7.3017 (m, 3H, H-C1, H-C2, H-C5), 2.4286 (s, 3H, H-C19). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 163.05, 134.87, 134.01, 133.28, 130.75, 130.72, 129.59, 129.35, 127.55, 123.91, 120.86, 21.93.

2.7.     N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(2-nitrophenyl) methanimine oxide (N3)

Yellow powder, m.p= 117-119 0C, yield= 74%, Rf= 0.71

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3097.68 (Ar-H) stretching, 1568.13 (C=N), 1568.13-1419.61(C=C), 1078.43 (N+-O-), 731.02 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.5897 (d, 1H, H-C18), 8.5781 (s,1H, H-C12), 8.4090 (d, 1H, H-C1), 8.4067 (d, 1H, H-C15), 8.1339 (t, 1H, H-C16), 7.9961 (t,1H, H-C17), 7.5387 (d, 1H, H-C2), 7.5299 (s, 1H, H-C5). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 147.85, 147.52, 135.06, 133.66, 133.65, 130.98, 130.92, 129.52, 128.80, 125.19, 124.13, 124.06, 120.81.

2.8.      N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine oxide (N4)

yellow powder, m.p=78-80 0C, yield= 49%, Rf= 0.57

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3080.32 (Ar-H) stretching, 2935.66 and 2833.43 aliphatic (C-H), 1587.42 (C=N), 1575.84-1456.26 (C=C), 1070.64 (N+-O-), 740.67 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.4517 (s,1H, H-C12), 7.9204 (s,1H, H-C5), 7.8333 (s, 1H, H-C18), 7.6338 (d, 1H, H-C1), 7.5028 (d, 1H, H-C2), 6.9198 (d, 2H, H14, H-C15), 3.9409 (s, 3H, H-C20 in methoxy), 3.9532 (s, 3H, H-C20 in methoxy). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 151.68, 148.54, 147.52, 134.85, 133.84, 133.26, 130.73, 124.52, 123.66, 123.41, 120.57, 111.16, 110.73, 55.99.

So far, in practical work, nitrobenzene containing electron withdrawing groups (two chlorine groups) have been studied, and from this section to 2.11 the nitrobenzene with electron donating groups (two methyl groups) have been considered.

2.9.     N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N5)

Pale yellow powder, m.p=66-68 0C, yield= 69.3%, Rf= 0.76.

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3064.89 (Ar-H) stretching, 2839.22 Aliphatic (C-H), 1581.63 (C=N), 1517.98-1456.26 (C=C), 1078.14 (N+-O-), 775.38 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.3888 (d,1H, H-C1), 7.8911 (s,1H, H-C12), 7.8525 (s, 1H, H-C5), 7.5719-7.4603 (m, 5H, H-C14, H-C15, H-C16, H-C17, H-C18), 7.2052 (d, 1H, H-C2), 2.3301 (s, 3H, H-C8), 2.3108 (s, 3H, H-C9). 13C NMR [300 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 147.02, 138.83, 137.76, 134.21, 130.81, 130.461, 130.03, 129.02, 128.61, 122.73, 118.79, 19.91, 19.53.

2.10.  N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-(p-tolyl)methanimine oxide (N6)

Yellow crystal, m.p=101-102 0C, yield= 61.9%, Rf= 0.73.

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3022.45 (Ar-H) stretching, 2976.16-2918.30 Aliphatic (C-H), 1598.99 (C=N), 1564.27-1417.68 (C=C), 1070.49 (N+-O-), 768.32 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.2928 (d,2H, H-C14, H-C18) 7.8429 (s, 1H, H-C12), 7.5725 (s, 1H, H-C5), 7.4646 (d,1H, H-C1 ) 7.2889 (d, 2H, H-C15, H-C17), 7.1872 (d, 1H, H-C2), 2.4035 (s, 3H, H-C19), 2.3196 (s, 3H, H-C8), 2.2989 (s, 3H, H-C9). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 147.03, 141.25, 138.58, 137.67, 134.04, 129.97, 129.57, 129.31, 129.06, 128.26, 122.69, 118.72, 21.76, 19.90, 19.51

c

.

2.11.   N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-

(2-nitrophenyl)methanimine oxide (N7) yellow powder, m.p=116-118 0C, yield= 81%, Rf= 0.72.

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3032.10 (Ar-H) stretching, 2935.66-2914.44 Aliphatic (C-H), 1564.27 (C=N), 1516.05 (C=C), 1072.42 (N+-O-), 790.81(Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.5507 (s,1H, H-C12), 8.0700 (d,1H, H-C1), 7.7466 (t, 1H, H-C17), 7.5529 (d, 1H, H-C15), 7.4973 (d, 1H, H-C18), 7.2402 (t,1H, H-C16), 7.2322 (d, 1H, H-C2), 7.1063 (s,1H, H-C5),2.3455 (s,3H, H-C9), 2.3276 (s, 3H, H-C8). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 154.57, 147.51, 147.22, 139.66, 137.97, 130.24, 129.42, 127.79, 124.97, 124.75, 122.70, 118.89, 106.83, 19.93, 19.60.

2.12.  1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)methanimine (N8)  

Light-yellow powder, m.p=108-110 0C, yield= 58% , Rf= 0.78.

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3020.53 (Ar-H) stretching, 2964.59-2918.30 Aliphatic (C-H), 1577.77 (C=N), 1508.33 (C=C),

1076.27 (N+-O-), 759.96 (Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [500 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.3551(s,1H, H-C12), 8.0723 (s, 1H, H-C5), 8.0099 (d, 1H, H-C1), 7.9977 (s, 1H, H-C14), 7.2410 (d, 1H, H-C2), 7.1565 (d, 1H, H-C17), 6.9371 (d, 1H, H-C18), 4.0098 (s, 3H, H-C19), 3.9598 (s, 3H, H-C20), 2.3667 (s, 3H, H-C9), 2.3364 (s, 3H, H-C8). 13C NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 159.04, 140.55, 137.27, 136.84, 130.31, 129.71, 126.85, 123.08, 122.99, 122.24, 119.61, 118.10, 110.47, 56.04, 19.90, 19.72.

2.13.  N-(4-(bromomethyl) phenyl)-1-(p-tolyl) methanimine oxide (N9)

Yellow powder, m.p=176-178 0C, yield= 38.5%, Rf= 0.72.

IR (KBr/ vmax/ cm-1): 3010.88 (Ar-H) stretching, 2956.87-2866.22 Aliphatic (C-H), 1597.06 (C=N), 1419.81-1577.77 (C=C), 1076.14 (N+-O-), 759.95(Ar-H) out-of-plane/ bending. 1H-NMR [300 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)]: 8.5353(s,1H, H-C10), 8.3316-7.9014 (m, 4H, H-C1, H-C2, H-C4, H-C5), 7.8721- 7.6776 (m, 4H, H-C12, H-C13, H-C15, H-C16), 3.0569 (s, 2H, H-C18), 2.4448 (s, 3H, H-C17). 13C NMR  [126 MHz, CDCl3, δ (ppm)] 136.84, 130.96, 130.39, 126.84, 124.51, 123.08, 122.98, 122.53, 119.61, 57.18, 19.90.

2.14.  Antibacterial and antifungal activity of nitrone derivatives

Activities of nitrones (N1-N9) were studied with two concentrations (1000 and 500) µg/ mL in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as antibacterial against E. coli as Gram-negative bacteria and S.aureus as Gram-positive bacteria and also as an antifungal Candida albicans fungi. Agar well diffusion method was used for the antibacterial activity of synthesized nitrones. After autoclaving of Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) was cooled to 55°C and poured onto petri dishes.  Then, with sterilized swabs, E. coli and S.aureus bacteria were completely streaked on them until they solidified and left for half an hour. After that, four wells of 8 mm were made on agar and (100 μL) of dimethyl sulfoxide, two different concentrations of synthesized nitrones and levofloxacin as a standard drug were placed. After incubation at 37°C for 28 hr, the zones of inhibition were determined in mm (Lino & Deogracious, 2006).

Antifungal activities of synthesized nitrones were compared with clotrimazole as a standard drug against Candida albicans. Sabouraud dextrose was used as the growth medium. 8 mm wells were cut and (100 μL) of two different concentrations of synthesized nitrone, DMSO and standard drug were placed. After incubation at 37°C for 28 hr, the zones of inhibition were determined in mm (Salman & Majeed, 2013) .

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this study, the starting materials for the synthesis of these nitrones (N1-N9) were nitrobenzene compounds in which bearing electron donating and electron withdrawing groups. Both types converted to corresponding phenylhydroxyl amine by Zn dust in aqueous solution and 85% of ethanol in presence of NH4Cl as a weak acid. Synthesized phenylhydroxylamines were converted to new nitrones after condensation reaction with various substituted benzaldehydes (scheme 3 and scheme 4).


 

 

 

 



 


Scheme 3: General pathway for the synthesis of nitrones (N1- N8) by procedure A

 


 

Scheme 4: General pathway for the synthesis of nitrone (N9) by procedure B

 


According to the FT-IR characterization, the peaks that were important for the detection of nitrones include (N+-O-) absorption bands in the range of  (1079-1068) cm-1, and also (C=N) peaks in the range of (1598-1564) cm-1. N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1- (p-tolyl)metanimine oxide, in which bearing CH3 group (electron donating group) in the (Ar-C=N) moiety, and two CH3 groups in (Ar-N=C) moiety, the peak of  (C=N) bond were appeared in the (1598.99) cm-1, and it was the highest frequency for this bond when compared with another synthesized nitrones (N6).

N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1-(2-nitrophenyl) methanimine oxide in which bearing NO2 group (electron withdrawing group) in the (Ar-C=N) moiety, and two chlorine substitutions (electron withdrawing groups) in (Ar-N=C) moiety, the peak of  (N+ــO-) bond were appeared in the (1078.43) cm-1, and it was the highest frequency for this bond when compared with another synthesized nitrones (N3).

Aromatic regions (Ar-H) were observed in the range (3100-3000) cm-1 and (aliphatic C-H) in the range (3000-2900) cm-1 were observed in the compounds in which these groups were present (Figure 3, 4 and 5).


 

 

 



Figure 3: FT-IR of N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N5)

 


 

 



Figure 4: FT-IR of N-(3,4- dichlorophenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N1)

 


 

 




Figure 5: FT-IR of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine oxide (N4)

 


 

 

 

In the case of 1H-NMR, there were three types of protons in the synthesized nitrones. The first type of protons were aromatic protons, which were present in all nitrones and included hydrogens in two aromatic rings (H-Ar-N=C) and (H-Ar-C=N).The second type was related to the proton attached to the carbon in (H-C=N), which was also present in all the synthesized nitrones. The last protons were related to the aliphatic substituents protons, which was present in some compounds and were as substituents on aryl rings. All proton signals, whether those related to aromatic regions or (H-C=N) as a singlet, and shifting was depending on the type of substitution, were observed in all synthesized nitrones. The spectrum of protons of aliphatic, either methyl (2-3 ppm) or methoxy (3-4 ppm) groups were clearly observed in the synthesized nitrones in which these substituents were present (figure 6, 7 and 8).


 

 

 



 


Figure 6: 1H-NMR of N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N5)


 

 



 

 


Figure 7: 1H-NMR of N-(3,4- dichlorophenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N1)




 

Figure 8: 1H-NMR of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine oxide (N4)

 


At 13C NMR, all peaks related to those carbons present in synthesized nitrones was observed, whether they were aromatic or aliphatic (N5, N1, N4), (Figures 9, 10 and 11) (Al Adhreai et al., 2022).

 

 



 


Figure 9: 13C NMR of N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N5)




Figure 10: 13C NMR of N-(3,4- dichlorophenyl)-1-phenylmethanimine oxide (N1)


 

 



 

Figure 11: 13C NMR of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine oxide (N4)

 


In the (N1-N4), the aromatic nitro compounds that had two Cl groups, after converted to corresponding phenylhydroxylamine and condensation reaction with four types of substituted benzaldehydes (benzaldehyde, 3-chloro benzaldehyde, 2-nitrobenzaldehyde and 3,4-dimethoxybenz aldehyde), the higher yields were obtained when benzaldehyde was (2-nitrobenzaldehyde).  The reason for this was the presence of the nitro group in the ortho position of benzaldehyde. It was an electron withdrawing group and increased electrophilicity of benzaldehyde and when a nucleophile (exist pair of electron on N atom) such as N-(3,4-dichlorophenylhydroxylamine) reacted with this benzaldehyde, the yield was higher than other three substituents of benzaldehydes (section 2.6, N3).

The lowest yield in this reaction was observed when     N- (3,4-dichlorophenylhydroxylamine) reacted with (3,4-dimethoxy benzaldehyde) due to the electron donating of methoxy groups   (-OCH3) in the benzaldehyde, which reduced the electrophilicity of the benzaldehyde and slower reaction occurred when attacked by nucleophile (section 2.7, N4).

In N5, N6, N7 and N8 all the topics described for (N1-N4), were applied to these synthesized nitrones, and therefore, it had the highest yield in N7 (section 2.10).

In these reactions when used two starting materials, one of them 1,2-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene and the other 1,2-dimethyl-4-nitrobenzene (scheme 3), their differences were in the types of substitutitionsa. In 1,2-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene there were two Cl groups, which were electron withdrawing groups. These groups were causes a lower yield when compared to 1,2-dimethyl-4-nitrobenzene (compare yields of  N1 and N5, N2 and N6, N3 and N7, N4 and N8). Due to the presence of two electron donating groups CH3 in 1,2-dimethyl-4-nitrobenzene with the same substituted benzaldehydes, the yield of synthesized nitrones was higher compared to 1,2-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene (West & Davis, 1989) .

Although N9 could not be prepared by method A and was prepared by method B, its yield was lower than other nitrones (scheme 4).

According to the studies of HK Kim (Kim et al., 1970) and Mariana C. Ferraz (Ferraz et al., 2017) on nitrone derivatives, it has been clearly shown that substitutions have a significant effect on the biological activities of nitrones. Their activities were considered accordingly, for two types of bacteria: E. coli as Gram negative bacteria, S. aureus as Gram-positive bacteria and also were considered as antifungal against Candida albicans fungi. The results were interesting. In general, the activity of synthesized nitrones in these two concentrations against Candida albicans was better than their activity against the mentioned bacteria. In nitrones (N1-N4), the presence of two methoxy groups in (Ar-CH=N) moiety caused inactivation of (N4) against E.coli, and when NO2 was present in (Ar-CH=N) moiety, the activity of nitrone was improved against E.coli bacteria and fungi (N3). The presence of CH3 in mentioned moiety prevented the growth of E.coli and S. aureus bacteria and Candida albicans in nitrone (N2).

In nitrones (N5-N8), their activity was better than the previous nitrones, and the presence of two methoxy groups in (Ar-CH=N) moiety caused the activity of nitrone (N8) to be high against both bacteria, and the presence of CH3 in the    (Ar-CH=N) moity decreased the activity of nitrone (N6) against E.oli bacteria.

Nitron (N9) was inactive against E.coli and also did not appear inhibition zone against S.aureus at the lower concentration. This nitrone was resistant only against fungus  Candida albicans (table 1).


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Antibacterial and antifungal of synthesized nitrones in different zone (mm)

 

N

microorganism

500 µg / mL in

(DMSO)

1000 µg / mL in (DMSO)

 

 

N1

Escherichia coli

20

22

Staphylococcus aureus

20

23

Candida albicans

19

20

 

N2

 

Escherichia coli

16

18

Staphylococcus aureus

16

17

Candida albicans

25

26

 

N3

Escherichia coli

15

22

Staphylococcus aureus

16

25

Candida albicans

25

28

 

N4

Escherichia coli

NI

NI

Staphylococcus aureus

19

20

Candida albicans

15

20

 

N5

Escherichia coli

20

25

Staphylococcus aureus

26

35

Candida albicans

22

23

 

N6

Escherichia coli

12

13

Staphylococcus aureus

15

16

Candida albicans

15

26

 

N7

Escherichia coli

18

20

Staphylococcus aureus

20

22

Candida albicans

25

30

 

N8

Escherichia coli

25

30

Staphylococcus aureus

28

30

Candida albicans

20

22

N9

Escherichia coli

NI

NI

Staphylococcus aureus

NI

12

Candida albicans

12

13

The inhibition zone of levofloxacin against E.coli bacteria= 36 mm and against S.aureus= 34 mm.

The inhibition zone of clotrimazole against Candida albicans= 33 mm

NI: not inhibition


 

 

 


CONCLUSION

In this study, the data obtained by FT-IR, 1H-NMR and 13C NMR spectra confirmed the structure of the new synthesized nitrones (N1-N9). In the prepared nitrone derivatives, both substituted phenylhydroxylamine derivatives and substituted benzaldehydes have a significant effect on their properties and yields.  For this reason nitrone (N7) was prepared with the highest yield (81%) in the condensation reaction between    substituted phenylhydroxyamine bearing electron donating groups (N-(3,4-dimethylphenyl) hydroxyl amine) and substituted benzaldehyde with electron withdrawing groups (2-nitrobenzaldehyde). The biological activities of synthesized nitrones showed that most of them were active against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria and all of them showed antifungal activity against Candida albicans.

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

Al Adhreai, A., Alsaeedy, M., Farooqui, M., & Al-Timari, U. (2022). regio-and stereoselectivity of 1, 3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of cinnarizine drug with chiral nitrones, and their antimicrobial activity. ci-stem Journal of Information Technology and Communication Engineering, 1(1), 01-10.

Besson, E., Gastaldi, S., Bloch, E., Zielonka, J., Zielonka, M., Kalyanaraman, B., Aslan, S., Karoui, H., Rockenbauer, A., & Ouari, O. (2019). Embedding cyclic nitrone in mesoporous silica particles for EPR spin trapping of superoxide and other radicals. Analyst, 144(14), 4194-4203.

 

 

Cai, B.-G., Li, L., Xu, G.-Y., Xiao, W.-J., & Xuan, J. (2021). Visible-light-promoted nitrone synthesis from nitrosoarenes under catalyst-and additive-free conditions. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 20(6), 823-829.

Deletraz, A., Zéamari, K., Hua, K., Combes, M., Villamena, F. A., Tuccio, B., Callizot, N., & Durand, G. (2020). Substituted α-phenyl and α-naphthlyl-N-tert-butyl nitrones: Synthesis, spin-trapping, and neuroprotection evaluation. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 85(9), 6073-6085.

Delpierre, G., & Lamchen, M. (1965). Nitrones. Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society, 19(4), 329-348.

Ferraz, M. C., Mano, R. A., Oliveira, D. H., Maia, D. S., Silva, W. P., Savegnago, L., Lenardão, E. J., & Jacob, R. G. (2017). Synthesis, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of chalcogen-containing nitrone derivatives from (R)-citronellal. Medicines, 4(2), 39.

Floyd, R. A., Hensley, K., Forster, M. J., Kelleher‐Anderson, J. A., & Wood, P. L. (2002). Nitrones as neuroprotectants and antiaging drugs. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 959(1), 321-329.

Ibrahim, H., Furiga, A., Najahi, E., Pigasse Hénocq, C., Nallet, J.-P., Roques, C., Aubouy, A., Sauvain, M., Constant, P., & Daffé, M. (2012). Antibacterial, antifungal and antileishmanial activities of indolone-N-oxide derivatives. The Journal of Antibiotics, 65(10), 499-504.

Janzen, E. G., & Blackburn, B. J. (1968). Detection and identification of short-lived free radicals by an electron spin resonance trapping technique. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 90(21), 5909-5910.

Jung, Y., Hong, J. E., Kwak, J.-H., & Park, Y. (2021). Single-Step Approach toward Nitrones via Pyridinium Ylides: The DMAP-Catalyzed Reaction of Benzyl Halides with Nitrosoarenes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 86(9), 6343-6350.

Kim, H. K., Yaktin, H. K., & Bambury, R. E. (1970). Nitrones. II.. alpha.-(5-Nitro-2-furyl)-N-cycloalkyl-and-N-alkylnitrones. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 13(2), 238-241.

Lino, A., & Deogracious, O. (2006). The in-vitro antibacterial activity of Annona senegalensis, Securidacca longipendiculata and Steganotaenia araliacea-Ugandan medicinal plants. African health sciences, 6(1), 31-35.

Mahieddine, C., Boukhechem, M. S., Zerkout, S., & Zitouni, A. (2016). Synthesis and Microbiological Activities of Novel Acyclic Nitrones. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 28(5), 1027.

Murahashi, S.-I., & Imada, Y. (2019). Synthesis and transformations of nitrones for organic synthesis. Chemical reviews, 119(7), 4684-4716.

Mutlaq, D. Z., Hassan, Q. M., Sultan, H., & Emshary, C. (2021). The optical nonlinear properties of a new synthesized azo-nitrone compound. Optical Materials, 113, 110815.

Salman, H. H. (2019). Antimicrobial evaluation of some new nitrone compounds derived from glyoxal. International Journal of Green Pharmacy (IJGP), 13(3).

Salman, H. H., & Majeed, N. N. (2013). Synthesis, characterization and study of biological activity of some new nitrone and isoxazolidine compounds. J Basrah Res (Sci), 39, 99-111.

Thakur, S., Das, A., & Das, T. (2021). 1, 3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrones: synthesis of multisubstituted, diverse range of heterocyclic compounds. New Journal of Chemistry, 45(26), 11420-11456.

West, P. R., & Davis, G. C. (1989). The synthesis of diarylnitrones. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 54(21), 5176-5180.