THE GREEN APPROACH FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF SOME HYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES COMPOUND VIA HANTZSCH REACTION

Layla Ahmed Othman1*

1 Department of general science, College of basic education, university of Duhok, Duhok, Iraq.

*Corresponding author’s email: layla.othman@uod.ac

 

Received:30 Aug. 2024 / Accepted: 4 Oct., 2024 / Published: 14 Oct., 2024.               https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2024.12.3.1377

ABSTRACT:

Since that hydroquinoline and acridine compounds serve as the fundamental building blocks for the synthesis of many different pharmaceuticals, they are among the most significant classes of chemical compounds that attract the interest of numerous researchers and pharmacologists. Therefore, in this research, The Hantzch reaction was used to prepare these types hydroquinoline and acridine  derivatives of compounds, through the reaction  of a number substituted benzaldehyde with demidone and  α-β diketone substitutes by refluxed with sodium acetate in the presence of iodine and a 1-sulfo-4-(3-(Ferricoxide-Silicondioxide nanopowdertrioxisilyl)propyl) piperazinum-1,4-diphosphate as a catalyst to form 7,7- dimethyl -4,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline derivatives which is represented by compounds (1-12) or in the same way by react  benzaldehyde substitutes react with demidone and 4-isopropyl cyclohexanone 1-one to form acridin derivatives  represented by compounds (13 -17). All product compound are characterized using 1H-NMR spectra and the results confirmed the structures.

KEYWORDS: Nanocatalyst, Hantzsch Reaction, Dimedone, Quinoline, Quinoline derivatives.


1.        INTRODUCTION:

        One of the most significant heterogeneous basic compounds with a single nitrogen atom is quinoline. Since this kind of chemical was initially isolated from coal around 1820, it can be found in natural sources (Kouznetsov et al., 2005). It can also be extracted from oil or even from wood. It has been prepared in several ways, including chemical photocyclic reactions (Mitamura & Ogawa, 2011; Willumstad et al., 2015) by cycling O-alkyl isocyanate compounds in the presence of iodine (Mitamura & Ogawa, 2011) and also made with titanium oxide present by converting the nitro group in aromatic compounds to an amine group (Park et al., 1995). It is possible to prepare quinoline compounds by using the ionic liquid system and ultrasound (Hamdoon & Saleh, 2022). One of the multi-component reactions that is crucial for the synthesis of numerous heterocyclic compounds, such as pyridine, quinoline, and acridine, is the Hantzch reaction (Sabbaghan et al., 2010). In order to create hydroquinoline derivatives at room temperature and without the use of solvent, (Motokura et al).

        were able to produce these compounds utilizing cobalt catalyst nanoparticles (Motokura et al., 2004; Sadeek et al., 2023). Agrochemical applications are reported for numerous quinoline compounds  ( Tumambac et al., 2004; Tong et al., 2003)  additionally to being employed in research on bio-organic and bio-organometallic processes  ( Safari et al., 2009; Reddy et al., 2012). They also play a role in the production of dyes (Anvar et al., 2012; A. Saleh & Saleh, 2022) food colorants (Ranu et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2010), pH indicators and other Organic compounds (Kulkarni & Török, 2010; Praveen et al., 2010). In additional to this they have also been used as ligands ( Lindner et al., 2018; Ali et al., 2023).

2.        MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Instrumental part

        Melting points were uncorrected using thermal SMP30 UK melting point apparatus. Were recorded using Alpha (ATR) instrument.1 HNMR spectra were recorded using Varian Agilent 499.53MHZ instrument, DMSO as internal solvent. All chemical were supplied by sigma –Aldrich, BHD and Fluka companies.

Synthesis of Catalyst

        Thermal SMP30 UK melting point apparatus was used to determine melting points without correction. Using the Alpha (ATR) instrument. Using DMSO as the internal solvent, 1 HNMR spectrum was recorded using a Varian Agilent 499.53MHZ instruments and DMSO as internal solvent. Companies like Sigma-Aldrich, BHD, and Fluka provided all of the chemicals.

The resultant mixture was centrifuged, decanted, washed twice with dry toluene and anhydrous Et2O, and dried under vacuum at 90oC to yield (II). After adding 0.75 ml of piperazinume hydrochloride (0.75 mmol) to 30 ml of toluene, the mixture was refluxed for 12 hours. Centrifuging and decanting were used to separate the resulting solid, the combination was created, and it was refluxed for 12 hours. To create (III), the resulting solid was separated by centrifuging, decanting, washing with toluene, and drying at 90 C under vacuum. In order to produce nano(Fe-Si-Si-Pr-Pip-H2PO4), H3PO4 (0.26 ml, 5 mmol) was progressively added to (III) at room temperature, agitated for 5 hours at that temperature and for 1 hour at 60 C, and then dried under vacuum for 90oC ( Saleh M. Y. et al., 2022).




                Figure 1: SEM image of sulfo-4-(3- (Ferricoxide-Silicondioxide nanopowder trioxisilyl) propyl) piperazinum-1,4- diphosphate.


Experimental part

Synthesis of some substituted of 7, 7- dimethyl -4,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline (1-6)

        In a round flask mix (0.001mol) appropriated of some different substituted benzaldehyde with (0.308g, 0.004mol) dimedone, (0.280g, 0.002mol) of ammonium acetate, (0.00015mol, 0.020g) acetylacetone compounds and again using (0.00015mol, 0.037g) of (1-sulfo-4-(3-(Carbon Nano sheet trioxisilyl) propyl) piperazinum-1, 4-diphosphate) in 10 ml of absolute ethanol. The mixture was refluxed. The reaction was followed by TLC (Dom: MeOH)) until the completion of the reaction. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was left to cool at room temperature. The solids were filtered, washed with cold ethanol, and dried. The crude product was recrystallized with methanol to give (1-6), Figure 2.some physical properties of this compounds are illustrated in Table 1


Figure 2: Synthesis of some substituted of 7, 7- dimethyl -4,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline (Saeed & Saleh, 2023).

 

Table 1:  The physical properties of Compounds (1-6).

Comp No.

Ar-

Molecular Formula

M. P. (℃)

Time

Yield%

Color

I2

Cat

I2

Cat

1

339.18

189-191

4h

1.30h

67

92

Pale brown

2

354.16

173-176

5h

1.30h

82

94

Pale red

3

353.42

167-169

11h

2h

56

91

Brown

4

323.44

197-198

4h

1.45h

73

96

Pale brown

5

323.44

212-213

4h

1.30h

78

96

Brown

6

388.31

177-178

6h

1.50h

66

93

Dark brown

   *Time and Yield with Catalyst (Cat.), time and yield without Catalyst (I2)*.

 


Synthesis of some substituted of 7-isopropyl -3,3- dimethyl

-3,4,5,6,78,8a,9,0a-decahydroacridin -1(2H)-one(7-12)

        Mixed (0.001mol) of someone different substituted benzaldehyde with (0.308g, 0.004mol) dimedone, (0.280g, 0.002mol) of ammonium acetate, (0.020g, 0.00015mol) menthone compounds in 10 ml of absolute ethanol. The mixture was refluxed. The reaction was followed by TLC (Dom: MeOH)) until the completion of the reaction. And other methods by using (0.00015mol, 0.037g) of (1-sulfo-4-(3-(Carbon nanosheet trioxisilyl)propyl)piperazinum-1,4-diphosphate) as a catalyst. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was left to cool at room temperature. The solids were filtered, washed with cold ethanol, and dried. The crude product was


recrystallized with methanol to give (7-12), Figure 3.some physical properties of this compounds are illustrated in Table 2.


Figure 3: Synthesis of some substituted of 7-isopropyl -3,3- dimethyl -3,4,5,6,78,8a,9,0a-decahydroacridin -1(2H)-one (Saied et al., 2022).


Table 2: The physical properties of Compounds (7-12).


Comp No.

     Ar-

  Molecular       Formula

M.P. (℃)

     Time

Yield%

Color

I2

    Cat

    I2

  Cat

7

379.54

199-201

6h

1.30h

     53

88

Brown

8

394.52

184-185

5.30h

1.15h

     44

86

Orang

9

393.53

175-177

5.30h

55min

     61

91

Dark brown

10

363.55

212-214

6h

1.20h

     56

83

Brown

11

363.55

227-229

6h

1.25h

     58

83

Brown

12

428.41

190-191

7.40h

1.45h

    47

90

Brown


*Time and Yield with Catalyst (Cat.), time 

3.  RESULT AND DISCUSSION

        The provided text is an abstract and a partial excerpt from a research paper discussing the green synthesis of heterocyclic compounds, specifically hydroquinoline and acridine derivatives, using the Hantzsch reaction was The reaction involves the use of substituted benzaldehyde, dimedone, α-β diketone, and other reagents, catalyzed by a novel nanocatalyst. The process is notable for being a more environmentally friendly approach to producing these compounds, which have applications in pharmaceuticals, dyes, food colorants, pH indicators, and other organic compounds. In figure 1, the image shows a magnetic catalytic material that has been synthesized, consisting of a core of magnetic iron oxide, coated with a silica layer, with additional functional groups contributing to its catalytic performance. This is an image captured using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), which shows the surface details of a sample. According to the information provided below the image, the sample has been magnified 50,000 times, and the field of view is approximately 4.15 micrometers. These details suggest a complex and irregular surface structure.

        Visually, the surface structure appears to be layered or clustered, which may indicate that the material has a large surface area, beneficial for chemical reactions in catalytic applications.

Physical Properties of Compounds (1-6) and (7-12): From the data presented in Tables 1 and 2, several trends and observations can be noted regarding the melting points, yields, and colors of the synthesized compounds.

        The melting points for compounds 1-6 range from (167-213)°C, and for compounds 7-12, they range from (175-229)°C.

The melting points of compounds increase as the molecular weight increases, but this is not strictly linear. For example, compound 6 has a molecular weight of 388.31 g/mol but a lower melting point (177-178) °C than compound 5 (M.P. 212-213°C), despite having a lower molecular weight (323.44 g/mol). This could be due to differences in the structural arrangement, intermolecular forces, or the presence of functional groups that impact crystal lattice stability.

        Reaction Times and Yields: Reactions without a catalyst (I2) take significantly longer compared to those using a catalyst. The time difference is notable in compounds 3 and 6, where reactions take 11h and 6h, respectively, without a catalyst, and significantly reduce to 2.0 h and 1.50 h with a catalyst.

The yields are also higher when using a catalyst, with increases ranging from around (25-30)%. This suggests that the catalyst plays a crucial role in both accelerating the reaction and improving the efficiency of the synthesis.

        The color of the compounds varies from pale brown to dark brown and pale red. The change in color may indicate different degrees of conjugation in the aromatic systems or the presence of different functional groups affecting the electronic environment of the compounds.

        1H-NMR Spectral Analysis (Compounds 1-6 and 7-12): In Tables 3 and 5, the 1H-NMR data provides information about the different chemical environments of protons in each compound. Several key trends can be noted:

        Most of the compounds exhibit signals in the range of 6.6 - 7.4 ppm, corresponding to the protons on the aromatic rings. The multiplicity of these signals (singlet, doublet, or multiplet) reflects the substitution patterns on the aromatic rings, with ortho, meta, and para relationships between substituents influencing coupling patterns.

Methoxy (OCH3) and Acetyl (CH3CO) Groups:

        Several compounds exhibit singlets around 3.6-4.9 ppm, corresponding to methoxy (OCH3) groups, and at 2.3-2.5 ppm for acetyl groups (CH3CO). The presence of these groups indicates that the aromatic rings are substituted, which can impact the electronic properties of the compounds, potentially explaining differences in reactivity and physical properties like melting points.

        The cyclic CH2 groups are generally observed between 1.8-2.1 ppm. These protons indicate the presence of cyclic structures in the backbone of the compounds, likely contributing to their stability and rigidity.

 The NH proton appears as a singlet in the range of 8.9-9.2 ppm across various compounds. The consistency of this peak suggests a stable NH group across the compounds, likely involved in hydrogen bonding interactions.

13C-NMR Spectral Analysis (Compounds 1-6 and 7-12): The 13C-NMR data in Tables 4 and 6 provides insights into the carbon environments within the compounds.

Peaks in the range of 110-160 ppm correspond to aromatic carbons. The presence of multiple signals in this region indicates complex substitution patterns on the aromatic rings, which influence the electronic properties of the compounds.

The signals around 190-196 ppm correspond to carbonyl groups, such as those in acetyl or amide functionalities. These carbonyl groups are crucial for the reactivity of the compounds, influencing both their melting points and interaction with other molecules.

        The signals around 14-30 ppm correspond to methyl (CH3) and cyclic methylene (CH2) groups, while the methoxy groups (-OCH3) are observed around 50-60 ppm. These groups are important for the solubility and overall structure of the compounds.

        Overall Trends and Observations: The use of a catalyst (Cat.) significantly reduces the reaction time and increases the yield. This catalytic effect is likely due to the catalyst facilitating the reaction mechanism, possibly by stabilizing the transition state or enhancing the electrophilicity of key intermediates.

The 1H and 13C NMR data indicate that the presence of substituents like methoxy, acetyl, and cyclic groups plays a significant role in determining both the physical and spectral properties of the compounds. These groups influence the electron density on the aromatic ring, affecting chemical shifts and coupling patterns. In addition, the main bands of the carbonyl group and the NH group in the infrared spectrum appear in the following bands Carbonyl group (C=O): Appears between 1700-1750 cm⁻¹.

•NH group (N-H): Appears between 3300-3500 cm⁻¹.

        There is a clear relationship between the molecular structure (as inferred from NMR data) and the physical properties such as melting point, color, and yield. More conjugated systems or those with electron-donating groups (e.g., methoxy) generally show lower melting and yield without Catalyst(I2)


 

Table 3: 1H NMR compounds (1-6) points, potentially due to weaker intermolecular interactions in the solid state.

1H NMR (DMSO, 400MHz): δ

Ar.

Comp No.

0.82(s, 3H), 0.99(s, 3H), 1.93,2.05(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 2.24(s, 3H), 2.48(s, 3H, acetyl), 3.64(s, 3H, OCH3), 4.84(s, 1H, CH), 6.71-6.76(m, 2H), 7.021-7.078(m, 2H), 9.024(s, 1H, NH).

1

0.842(s, 3H), 0.985(s, 3H), 1.89(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 2.108(s, 3H), 2.323(s, 3H, acetyl), 5.06(s, 1H, CH), 7.404(d, 2H,), 8.098(d, 2H), 9.237(s, 1H, NH).

2

0.96(s, 3H), 1.067(s, 3H), 1.892,2.142(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 2.225(s, 3H), 2.465(s, 3H, acetyl), 3.959(s, 2H, O-CH2-O), 4.74(s, 1H, CH), 6.679(d, 1H), 6.989-7.017(d, 2H), 8.981(s, 1H, NH).

3

1.15(s, 3H), 1.21(s, 3H), 2.225(s, 3H,-CH3), 2.889, 2.912(s, 4H, cyclic), 3.396(s, 3H), 3.959(s, 3H, acetyl), 4.47(s, 1H), 6.678-6.707(m, 2H), 7.286-7.337(m, 2H), 9.23(s, 1H).

4

1.115(s, 3H), 1.147(s, 3H), 2.225(s, 3H,-CH3), 3.889, 3.912(s, 4H, cyclic), 3.396(s, 3H), 3.959(s, 3H, acetyl), 4.74(s, 1H), 6.678-6.707(m, 2H), 7.286-7.337(m, 2H), 9.21(s, 1H).

5

0.772(s, 3H), 0.961(s, 3H), 1.903(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 2.225(s, 3H), 2.465(s, 3H, acetyl), 4.927(s, 1H, CH), 7.360(d, 2H,), 8.066(d, 2H), 9.197(s, 1H, NH).

6

 

Table 4: C13-NMR compounds (1-6)

 

Compound structure

C13-NMR (DMSO, 400MHz): δ

1

C22 (19.11), C20,21 (26.57), C2,10(29.71), C3(31.93),C23 (35.43), C1(50.36), C24(54.89), C5,9(111.12, 111.76), C16,18(112.64, 112.98), C19,15(117.75), 128.47, C14(139.29),C4,8(144.04, 148.70),C17 (157.14), C6(194.41)and C11(197.40).

2

19.39, 26.36, 29.12, 30.35, 32.22, 36.57, 50.20, 109.73, 112.10, 123.43, 128.75, 142.75, 145.63, 145.75, 149.87, 154.36, 161.96, 194.31and 196.49.

3

14.28, 18.36, 26.60, 29.24, 32.23, 35.00, 50.37, 54.95, 59.09, 104.00, 110.28, 113.18, 117.80, 128.48, 140.11, 144.72, 149.33, 157.37, 161.98, 167.03, and 194.36.

4

14.16, 18.42, 26.52, 29.08, 32.22, 36.71, 50.14, 59.33, 102.46, 109.11, 123.24, 128.84, 145.73, 146.24, 150.17, 155.07, 161.96, 166.48 and 194.32.

5

13.16, 19.42, 26.28, 27.08, 32.22, 35.71, 50.14, 55.36, 112.46, 119.12, 123.51, 127.84, 146.73, 149.24, 151.68, 155.90, 167.96, 169.48 and 192.21.

6

14.25, 18.32, 27.23 , 29.21 , 31.31 , 35.37 , 59.17, 101.59, 117.80 , 127.91, 129.31, 130.51, 145.74, 147.20, 151.28 , 156.28 , 166.85 and 191.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 5: 1H NMR compounds (7-12)

Comp No.

Ar.

1H NMR (DMSO, 400MHz): δ

7

0.84(d, 6H), 1.10(s, 6H), 1.43(m,1H), 1.51(q,1H), 1.61(q,2H), 1.79(t,2H), 2.21(d,2H), 1.93,2.05(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 3.64(s, 3H, OCH3), 4.84(s, 1H, CH), 6.61-6.86(m, 2H), 7.21-7.78(m, 2H), 9.24(s, 1H, NH).

8

0.99(d, 6H), 1.20(s, 6H), 1.46(m,1H), 1.61(q,1H), 1.67(q,2H), 1.79(t,2H), 2.31(d,2H), 1.89(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 5.60(s, 1H, CH), 7.44(d, 2H,), 8.08(d, 2H), 9.27(s, 1H, NH).

9

0.88(d, 6H), 1.16(s, 6H), 1. 30(m,1H), 1.55(q,1H), 1.61(q,2H), 1.97(t,2H), 2.19(d,2H), 1.892,2.142(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 3.959(s, 2H, O-CH2-O), 4.74(s, 1H, CH), 6.67(d, 1H), 6.99-7.17(d, 2H), 8.91(s, 1H, NH).

10

0.10(d, 6H), 1.23(s, 6H), 1.53(m,1H), 1.61(q,1H), 1.78(q,2H), 1.91(t,2H), 2.31(d,2H), 2.525(s, 3H,-CH3), 2.89,2.92(s, 4H, cyclic), 4.47(s, 1H), 6.68-6.77(m, 2H), 7.286-7.337(m, 2H), 9.23(s, 1H).

11

0.91(d, 6H), 1.12(s, 6H), 1.38(m,1H), 1.55(q,1H), 1.66(q,2H), 1.79(t,2H), 2.41(d,2H), 2.52(s, 3H,-CH3), 3.889,3.912(s, 4H, cyclic), 4.74(s, 1H), 6.78-6.77(m, 2H), 7.26-7.33(m, 2H), 9.02(s, 1H).

12

0.98(d, 6H), 1.33(s, 6H), 1.55(m,1H), 1.59(q,1H), 1.81(q,2H), 1.98(t,2H), 2.19(d,2H), 2.903(s, 4H, 2 groups CH2 cyclic), 4.97(s, 1H, CH), 7.60(d, 2H,), 8.66(d, 2H), 9.97(s, 1H, NH).

 

Table 6: 13C NMR compounds (7-12)

 

 

C13-NMR (DMSO, 400MHz): δ

7

21.11, 23.34 , 27.25 , 27.83 , 28.45 , 32.46 , 32.89 , 33.76 , 38.38 , 40.56 , 51.26 , 55.28 , 111.14 , 111.90 , 115.29 , 131.34 , 134.78 , 135.56 , 149.56 , 157.67 and 194.78

8

21.43, 24.45 , 26.56 , 27.83 , 28.98 , 32.61 , 34.89 , 35.64 , 39.80 , 40.56 , 51.61 , 112.41 , 113.90 , 117.29 , 133.41 , 137.89 , 139.56 , 144.34 , 153.65 and 196.78

9

21.43, 24.45 , 26.56 , 27.83 , 28.98 , 32.61 , 34.89 , 35.64 , 39.80 , 40.56 , 51.61 , 101.25 , 112.41 , 113.90 , 133.41 , 137.89 , 139.56 , 148.34 , 149.56 , 153.65 and 194.78

10

21.11, 23.34 , 27.25 , 27.83 , 28.45 , 32.46 , 32.89 , 33.76 , 38.38 , 40.56 , 51.26 , 55.28 , 111.14 , 111.90 , 115.29 , 131.34 , 134.78 , 135.56 , 138.34 , 149.56 and 194.78

11

21.11, 23.34 , 27.25 , 27.83 , 28.45 , 32.46 , 32.89 , 33.76 , 38.38 , 40.56 , 51.26 , 55.28 , 111.14 , 111.90 , 115.29 , 131.34 , 134.78 , 135.56 , 139.37 , 149.56 and 194.78

12

21.11, 23.34 , 27.25 , 27.83 , 28.45 , 32.46 , 32.89 , 33.76 , 38.38 , 40.56 , 51.26 , 55.28 , 111.14 , 111.90 , 115.29 , 121.45 , 131.34 , 134.78 , 135.56 , 149.56 and 194.78

 


 

 

                                         Figure 4: Mechanizium of synthesis catalist (Raoof et al., 2022)


 

Figure 5: Suggestion mechanizium of synthesis hydroquinoline derivatives.

 

Figure 6: Structures of Tetrahydroquinoline and Octahydroacridin Derivatives Synthesized via the Hantzsch Reaction

 


CONCLUSION

        In conclusion, the research successfully synthesized hydroquinoline and acridine derivatives using the Hantzsch reaction. Substituted benzaldehydes were reacted with demidone and α-β diketone substitutes in the presence of sodium acetate and iodine, with a specific nanopowder catalyst, to form 7,7-dimethyl-4,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline derivatives (compounds 1-12). Similarly, acridine derivatives (compounds 13-17) were obtained by reacting substituted benzaldehydes with demidone and 4-isopropyl cyclohexanone under the same conditions. These compounds are significant as they serve as fundamental building blocks in the synthesis of various pharmaceuticals. Overall, the prepared catalyst enhances the speed and efficiency of the reaction, making it an essential step in the synthesis of hydroquinoline and acridine derivatives.

Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflicting interests.

Sources of funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contribution: Authors contributed equally in the study.

REFERENCES

 

 Kouznetsov, V. V., Méndez, L. Y. V., & Gómez, C. M. M. (2005). Recent progress in the synthesis of quinolines. Current Organic Chemistry9(2), 141-161.

 

 Willumstad, T. P., Boudreau, P. D., & Danheiser, R. L. (2015). Synthesis of highly substituted quinolines via a tandem ynamide benzannulation/iodocyclization strategy. The Journal of Organic Chemistry80(23), 11794-11805. DOI: org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b01648.

 

 Mitamura, T., & Ogawa, A. (2011). Synthesis of 2, 4-diiodoquinolines via the photochemical cyclization of o-alkynylaryl isocyanides with iodine. The Journal of OrganicChemistry76(4),11631166.DOI:org/10.1021/jo1021772).

 

 Park, K. H., Joo, H. S., Ahn, K. I., & Jun, K. (1995). One step synthesis of 4-ethoxy-1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydroquinoline from nitroarene and ethanol: A TiO2 mediated photocatalytic reaction. Tetrahedron letters36(33), 5943-5946.DOI: org/10.1016/0040-4039(95)01204-U.

 

 Hamdoon, A. M., & Saleh, M. Y. (2022). Synthesis & biological evaluation of novel series of benzo [f] indazole derivatives. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry65(11), 305-312.DOI: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2022.120818.5418

 

 Sabbaghan, M., Yavari, I., Hossaini, Z., & Souri, S. (2010). A Novel One‐Pot Synthesis of Substituted Quinolines. Helvetica Chimica Acta93(5), 946-950. DOI: org/10.1002/hlca.200900304.

 

 Motokura, K., Mizugaki, T., Ebitani, K., & Kaneda, K. (2004). Multifunctional catalysis of a ruthenium-grafted hydrotalcite: one-pot synthesis of quinolines from 2-aminobenzyl alcohol and various carbonyl compounds via aerobic oxidation and aldol reaction. Tetrahedron letters45(31), 6029-6032. DOI: org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.06.023.

 

 Sadeek, G. T., Saeed, Z. F., & Saleh, M. Y. (2023). Synthesis and pharmacological profile of hydrazide compounds. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology16(2),975982.DOI: 10.52711/0974360X.23.

 

 Tong, H., Wang, L., Jing, X., & Wang, F. (2003). “Turn-on” conjugated polymer fluorescent chemosensor for fluoride ion. Macromolecules36(8), 2584 2586. DOI: org/10.1021/ma0258612,

 

 Tumambac, G. E., Rosencrance, C. M., & Wolf, C. (2004). Selective metal ion recognition using a fluorescent 1, 8-diquinolylnaphthalene-derived sensor in aqueous solution. Tetrahedron60(49),1129311297. DOI: org/10.1016/j.tet.2004.07.053.

 

  Reddy, T. R., Reddy, L. S., Reddy, G. R., Yarbagi, K., Lingappa, Y., Rambabu, D., ... & Pal, M. (2012). Construction of a quinoline ring via a 3-component reaction in water: crystal structure analysis and H-bonding patterns of a 2-aryl quinoline. Green Chemistry14(7),1870-1872.DOI: org/10.1039/C2GC35256G.

 

  Safari, J., Banitaba, S. H., & Samiei, S. S. (2009). One-pot synthesis of quinaldine derivatives by using microwave irradiation without any solvent—A green chemistry approach. Journal of chemical sciences121, 481-484. DOI: .org/10.1007/s12039-009-0057-0.

 

   Saleh, A., & Saleh, M. Y. (2022). Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds by cyclization of Schiff bases prepared from capric acid hydrazide and study of biological activity. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry65(12), 783-792.DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2022.133946.5904.

 

 Anvar, S., Mohammadpoor-Baltork, I., Tangestaninejad, S., Moghadam, M., Mirkhani, V., Khosropour, A. R., & Kia, R. (2012). Efficient and environmentally-benign three-component synthesis of quinolines and bis-quinolines catalyzed by recyclable potassium dodecatungstocobaltate trihydrate under microwave irradiation. RSC advances2(23), 8713-8720. DOI:  10.1039/C2RA20639K.

 

 Zhu, H., Yang, R. F., Yun, L. H., & Li, J. (2010). Facile and efficient synthesis of quinoline-4-carboxylic acids under microwave irradiation. Chinese Chemical Letters21(1), 35-38.DOI: org/10.1016/j.cclet.2009.09.012.

 

 Ranu, B. C., Hajra, A., & Jana, U. (2000). Microwave-assisted simple synthesis of quinolines from anilines and alkyl vinyl ketones on the surface of silica gel in the presence of indium (III) chloride. Tetrahedron Letters41(4), 531-533. DOI: .org/10.1016/S0040-4039(99)02111-5.

 

 Kulkarni, A., & Török, B. (2010). Microwave-assisted multicomponent domino cyclization–aromatization: an efficient approach for the synthesis of substituted quinolines. GreenChemistry12(5),875878. DOI: org/10.1039/C001076F.

 Praveen, C., DheenKumar, P., Muralidharan, D., & Perumal, P. T. (2010). Synthesis, antimicrobial and antioxidant evaluation of quinolines and bis (indolyl) methanes. Bioorganic&medicinalchemistryletters20(24),72927296. DOI: org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.

 

 Lindner, T., Loktev, A., Altmann, A., Giesel, F., Kratochwil, C., Debus, J., ... & Haberkorn, U. (2018). Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. Journal of Nuclear Medicine59(9),14151422. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.23.

 

 Ali, A. H., Saleh, M. Y., & Owaid, K. A. (2023). Mild Synthesis, Characterization, and Application of some Polythioester Polymers Catalyzed by Cetrimide Ionic Liquid as a Green and Eco-Friendly Phase-Transfer Catalyst. Iranian Journal of Catalysis13(1). DOI: 10.30495/IJC.2023.1973500.1977

 

 Saleh, M. Y., Al-barwari, A. S., & Ayoob, A. I. (2022). Synthesis of Some Novel 1, 8-Naphthyridine Chalcones asAntibacterialAgents. JournalofNanostructures12(3),598606. DOI: 10.22052/JNS.2022.

 

 Saeed, Z. F., & Saleh, M. Y. (2023). Synthesis and biological evolution of novel substituted 1, 2, 4-triazine from sulfanilic acid. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry66(1), 555-561.DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2022.132916.5870.

 

  Saied, S. M., Saleh, M. Y., & Hamdoon, A. M. (2022). Multicomponent synthesis of Tetrahydrobenzo [a] xanthene and Tetrahydrobenzo [a] acridine derivatives using Sulfonated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Heterogeneous Nanocatalysts. Iranian Journal of Catalysis12(2),189205.DOI:10.30495/IJC.2022.19554.

 

  Raoof, S. A., Ahmed, F. J., Al-barwari, A. S., & Saleh, M. (2022). Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Activity of Chromium Complexes as Efficient and Novel Catalysts for Direct Synthesis of Carbonyl Compounds from Benzyl/Cycloalkyl Bromides in Water under Aerobic Oxidation. Iranian Journal of Catalysis12(1).