ADOMIAN DECOMPOSITION METHOD AND VARIATIONAL ITERATION METHOD FOR SOLVING SASA-SATSUMA EQUATION
Knier A. Salih 1,* , Saad A. Manaa1
1 Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
*Corresponding author: knier.salih@uoz.edu.krd
Received: 20 May 2025 Accepted:25Apr 2025 Published:5 Jul 2025 https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2025.13.3.1561
ABSTRACT:
The Sasa-Satsuma equation is an integrable higher-order nonlinear Schrodinger equation. In this paper, two schemes are proposed to study numerical solutions of the Sasa-Satsuma nonlinear Schrödinger equation with initial conditions using the Adomian decomposition method and the variational iteration method. Both approaches produce quickly convergent series for each scheme with particularly important features. The present results have been displayed graphically and, in a table, to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of those techniques. The results obtained by the Adomian decomposition method are compared with the exact solution as well as the results obtained by variational iteration method. A comparison between the two approaches reveals that the Adomian decomposition approach is closer and more efficient than the variational iteration approach.
KEYWORDS: Sasa-Satsuma Equation, Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation, Numerical Solution, Adomian Decomposition Method, Variational Iteration Method.
1. INTRODUCTION
Due to its fundamental structure in soliton transmission technology, the optical soliton pulse has significant uses in the telecommunications and optical fiber industries (Kivshar & Agrawal, 2003). According to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE), which describes the fundamental events, the nonlinear form of the refractive index is directly proportional to the light intensity (Murad, Hamasalh, & Ismael, 2024). Furthermore, only the self-phase modulation effects and group velocity dispersion are taken into account in the NLSE (Adams & Hughes, 2019). However, it is important to consider the effects of stimulated Raman scattering, self-steepening, and third-order dispersion for ultrashort pulses in optical fibers (J. P. Wu & Geng, 2017). Owing to these effects, the Sasa-Satsuma equation (SSE) can be used to describe the dynamics of the ultrashort pulses.
One of the nontrivial integrable extensions of the NLSE is the SSE (C. Wu et al., 2022). While looking for integrable examples of a higher-order NLSE that Kodama and Hasegawa had proposed, Sasa and Satsuma came across it (Sasa & Satsuma, 1991). Due to its huge use, it received a lot of attention and has been thoroughly researched (Li et al., 2020; Murad, Hamasalh, Arnous, et al., 2024). Thus, the purpose of this article is to analyses the numerical solution of the issue using the variation iteration method (VIM) and the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) and show how each approach affects the equation. Semi-analytic techniques are the key concept behind those approaches. Additionally, as the new methods do not require the discretization of variables, computation round-off errors are not introduced, and large computer memory and time are not required. However, the ADM considers the approximate solution to be an infinite series, which typically converges to the exact solution (Dehghan & Salehi, 2011). Moreover, a comparison between the exact solution and the numerical approaches will be conducted.
Adomian first proposed the decomposition technique at the start of the 1980s (Tatari et al., 2011). The ADM offers an efficient method for the analytical solution of a broad and extensive class of dynamical systems that represent actual physical issues (Kumar & Malik, 2023; Ray & Bera, 2005). The ADM is a well-known systematic approach for the practical solution of operator equations that are linear or nonlinear, deterministic or stochastic, such as integral equations, integro-differential equations, ordinary differential equations, and partial differential equations (Azzo & Manaa, 2022; Duan et al., 2012; Sabali et al., 2021). In order to construct the numerical solution of the differential equations, the ADM has been successfully used as Kuramoto Sivashinsky Equation (Manaa et al., 2014), the Bagley–Torvik equation (Ray & Bera, 2005), coupled Burger’s equations (Chen & An, 2008), Time-Fractional Coupled Klein-Gordon Schrodinger Equation (Hesameddini & Fotros, 2012), Fokker–Planck equation (Tatari et al., 2007), and so also (Sabali et al., 2018). It offers an effective numerical solution with few computations and can be used to find approximation or even closed-form analytical solutions of differential equations without linearization or perturbation (Chen & An, 2008; Hesameddini & Fotros, 2012).
Chinese mathematician Ji-Huan He proposed the VIM, which has recently been the subject of extensive research by engineers and scientists and has been successfully applied to a variety of nonlinear issues, like the Duffing equation (He, 1999), the Schrödinger equation (Sadigh Behzadi, 2011), the self-focusing NLSE (Wazwaz & Kaur, 2019), and the nonlinear fractional differential equation (Odibat & Momani, 2006). Its simplicity and ease of use are advantages, and it is based on the Lagrange multiplier (Sweilam & Al-Bar, 2007). The approach has been demonstrated to solve a wide class of nonlinear problems efficiently, simply, and precisely. Usually, very accurate solutions are obtained after one or two iterations (Akram Abdulqadr & Nawzad Mustafa, 2025; Ghorbani & Saberi-Nadjafi, 2009).
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL:
The formulation of SSE in its dimensionless form is as follows:
.
(1)
where .
The symbol for time in dimensionless
form is , and the
non-dimensional distance is represented by
.
, often known as
the soliton profile, is the dependent variable with complex values. For the
integrable nonlinear Schrödinger perturbation, the positive real parameter
is used. The exact
soliton solution of equation (1), as in Akhmediev et al. (2015), is:
,
(2)
and the initial condition is:
.
(3)
Where ,
,
and
.
3. ADOMIAN DECOMPOSITION METHOD:
In this section, the fundamental concept of the ADM and the derivative of it on the SSE will be introduced.
Basic Idea of the Adomian Decomposition Method:
Consider the following nonlinear differential equation:
.
(4)
The operator of the higher-order derivatives
is denoted by ,
is a nonlinear
term and
a linear term.
Under the initial conditions:
.
(5)
Using the specified condition and
applying the inverse operator to both sides of
equation (4), we get
. (6)
The sum of the generic solution to the following equation is
.
(7)
Also, which is usually
represented by the sum of series, and it is the nonlinear operator
.
(8)
Where is Adomian’s
polynomial of
,
,
,… which is
defined as
.
(9)
The following recursive relations are now available to us by the ADM:
.
(10)
.
(11)
Derivative of Adomian Decomposition Method for Sasa-Satsuma Equation:
Consider the SSE (1) in an operator form:
.
(12)
Where, ,
,
, and
.
Applying the inverse operator to both sides of
the equation (12) and using the initial condition (5), yields
. (13)
Usually, the solutions defined as an
infinite series
. (14)
Then, we get
,
(15)
. (16)
Where ,
, and
, are the Adomian
polynomial which is defined by (9), and can be de rived by
,
, …
,
, ...
,
.
Similar methods can be used to
construct other polynomials. The first few elements of appear right away
after establishing
, (17)
,
(18)
. (19)
Then
. (20)
Variational Iteration Method:
This section aims to introduce the fundamental concept of the VIM and its application to the SSE.
Basic Idea of the Variational Iteration Method:
Examine a nonlinear differential equation in its generic form:
.
(21)
The VIM permits the application of a correction functional like
.
(22)
where is
a general Lagrange multiplier. Be aware that the Lagrange multiplier
can
be either a function or a constant and that
is a limited
value, meaning it acts like a constant, this leads to
, where
is
the variational derivative. It has been demonstrated in the literature that the
variational theory provides the best way to identify the Lagrange multiplier
.
The successive approximations
of the solution
can be easily
obtained using the resulting Lagrange multiplier and any function
. Consequently, the
remedy is
.
(23)
Derivative of Variational Iteration Method for Sasa-Satsuma Equation:
Consider the SSE (1), The function for rectification is supplied by
. (24)
where we used . Adding to the
correction function equation (24)
. (25)
The initial condition can be used to
choose option . The subsequent
approximations obtained by including this selection into the correction
function are as follows:
,
(26)
, (27)
.
(28)
In a similar way, we can find others. Then, the approximate solutions will take the forms:
. (29)
where is
the closing iteration step.
Application with Numerical Result:
This section compares the findings of the current research with the exact answer by using the method covered in the previous section to determine the numerical solution of the SSE.
The numerical result of equation (1)
when obtained by ADM
can be seen below
.
(30)
. (31)
.
(32)
The numerical result of equation (1) obtained by VIM can be seen below
.
(33)
. (34)
.
(35)
Table 1: Exact
solution and approximation solution of the methods: ADM, and VIM as and
.
|
Exact |
ADM |
VIM |
-4 |
7.19999675704251 |
7.19999687520657 |
7.19999687147890 |
-3.1 |
7.19988131443288 |
7.19988570020443 |
7.19988569647741 |
-2.2 |
7.19565759196166 |
7.19581796926491 |
7.19581796556179 |
-1.3 |
7.04276818063409 |
7.04838142211047 |
7.04838142057263 |
-0.4 |
3.17319894806841 |
3.20804302110690 |
3.20804311584250 |
0.5 |
4.17756629096868 |
4.13432907550746 |
4.13432909999134 |
1.4 |
7.09434775438805 |
7.09042053762901 |
7.09042053517082 |
2.3 |
7.19709239790624 |
7.19698151480717 |
7.19698151109463 |
3.2 |
7.19992053788026 |
7.19991750374966 |
7.19991750002243 |
4 |
7.19999676093172 |
7.19999663559850 |
7.19999663187084 |
Table 2:
The absolute error of exact solution, ADM, and VIM as
and
.
|
|
1.18164058982018e-07 |
1.14436392806283e-07 |
4.38577155392750e-06 |
4.38204453612201e-06 |
1.60377303251025e-04 |
1.60373600129660e-04 |
5.61324147637698e-03 |
5.61323993853691e-03 |
3.48440730384874e-02 |
3.48441677740858e-02 |
4.32372154612253e-02 |
4.32371909773401e-02 |
3.92721675904717e-03 |
3.92721921722838e-03 |
1.10883099069703e-04 |
1.10886811606647e-04 |
3.03413060009916e-06 |
3.03785782840293e-06 |
1.25333221134838e-07 |
1.29060884646037e-07 |
Total |
|
|
|
8.790067053689166e-02 |
8.790074171856954e-02 |
![]() |
(a) Exact solution of SSE.
![]() |
(b) ADM of SSE.
![]() |
(c) VIM of SSE.
Figure 1: The 3D mesh of the exact solution, ADM, and VIM for SSE
.
![]() |
(a) The curves of ADM and VIM to the exact solution.
(b) The zooming curves of ADM and VIM to the exact solution.
Figure 2: The curves show how ADM, and VIM are
closer to the exact solution for SSE. While selecting from both methods, when
and
.
CONCLUSION
In several applications, including
optics, higherorder and multicomponent versions of the NLSE are significant.
One of these equations, the integrable SSE, has particularly interesting
soliton solutions. In this study, the numerical solution of this equation was
developed for the first time by both numerical methods, ADM and VIM. Both
methods for computing series or exact solutions are significant in applied
sciences due to their direct application to all differential and integral
equations, reducing computational work while maintaining high numerical
accuracy. Both methods demonstrate effectiveness in finding exact solutions to
nonlinear problems. Moreover, the VIM requires the evaluation of the Lagrange
multiplier, whereas ADM requires the evaluation of the Adomian polynomials that
mostly require tedious algebraic calculations. Furthermore, the numerical
results that are obtained are compared with the exact solution while choosing from both methods. The
results indicate that the absolute error of the ADM is smaller than the VIM, as
shown in table (2) and figure (2). As a result, the ADM produces more accurate
results compared with the VIM. The high agreement of the approximation of
between
the methods makes them an alternative for solving the NLSEs. Further work will
focus on comparing the results obtained with a new numerical method and those
obtained using the current methods.
Acknowledgments:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the editors and referees' helpful comments in order to make this work better. We want to express our sincere appreciation to Professor Dr. Fadhil H. Easif for his valuable comments on this manuscript.
Author Contributions:
Knier A. Salih was responsible for writing the main script and conducting the primary research. Saad A. Manaa supervised, provided guidance, and reviewed the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the final version of the paper.
Funding:
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of Interest:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Adams, C. S., & Hughes, I. (2019). Optics f2f: from Fourier to Fresnel. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786788.003.0007
Akhmediev, N., Soto-Crespo, J. M., Devine, N., & Hoffmann, N. P. (2015). Rogue wave spectra of the Sasa–Satsuma equation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 294, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2014.11.006
Akram Abdulqadr, D., & Nawzad Mustafa, A. (2025). Global Stability And Hopf Bifurcation Of A Delayed Predator-Prey Model Incorporating Allee Effect And Fear Effect. 13(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2024.12.3.1406
Azzo, S. M., & Manaa, S. A. (2022). Sumudu-Decomposition Method to Solve Generalized Hirota-Satsuma Coupled Kdv System. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 10(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2022.10.2.879
Chen, Y., & An, H. L. (2008). Numerical solutions of coupled Burgers equations with time- and space-fractional derivatives. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 200(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.10.050
Dehghan, M., & Salehi, R. (2011). The use of variational iteration method and Adomian decomposition method to solve the Eikonal equation and its application in the reconstruction problem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 27(4), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1315
Duan, J.-S., Rach, R., Baleanu, D., & Wazwaz, A.-M. (2012). A review of the Adomian decomposition method and its applications to fractional differential equations. Communications in Fractional Calculus, 3(2), 73–99.
Ghorbani, A., & Saberi-Nadjafi, J. (2009). An effective modification of He’s variational iteration method. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 10(5), 2828–2833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.08.008
He, J.-H. (1999). Variational iteration method-a kind of non-linear analytical technique: some examples. In International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 34(4), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1
Hesameddini, E., & Fotros, F. (2012). Solution for Time-Fractional Coupled Klein-Gordon Schrodinger Equation Using Decomposition Method. In International Mathematical Forum 7(21) 1047-1056.
Kivshar, Y. S., & Agrawal, G. P. (2003). Optical solitons: from fibers to photonic crystals. Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410590-4.X5000-1
Kumar, A., & Malik, M. (2023). IMPACT OF HUNTING COOPERATION AND FEEDBACK CONTROL FOR A NONLINEAR HYBRID LESLIE–GOWER PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEM ON NONUNIFORM TIME DOMAIN. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 53(2), 485–515. https://doi.org/10.1216/rmj.2023.53.485
Li, C., Chen, L., & Li, G. (2020). Optical solitons of space-time fractional Sasa-Satsuma equation by F-expansion method. Optik, 224, 165527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165527
Manaa, S. A., Easif, F. H., & Yousif, M. A. (2014). Adomian Decomposition Method for Solving the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation. In IOSR Journal of Mathematics 10(1), 08-12. https://doi.org/ 10.9790/5728-10110812
Murad, M. A. S., Hamasalh, F. K., Arnous, A. H., Malik, S., Iqbal, M., & Nofal, T. A. (2024). Optical solitons with conformable fractional evolution for the (3+1)-dimensional Sasa–Satsuma equation. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 56(10), 1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-07617-8
Murad, M. A. S., Hamasalh, F. K., & Ismael, H. F. (2024). Time-fractional Chen-Lee-Liu equation: Various optical solutions arising in optical fiber. Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics and Materials, 33(6), 2350061. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218863523500613
Odibat, Z. M., & Momani, S. (2006). Application of Variational Iteration Method to Nonlinear Differential Equations of Fractional Order. In International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 7(1), 27-34. https:// doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2006.7.1.27
Ray, S. S., & Bera, R. K. (2005). Analytical solution of the Bagley Torvik equation by Adomian decomposition method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 168(1), 398–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.006
Sabali, A. J., Manaa, S. A., & Easif, F. H. (2018). Adomian and Adomian-Padé Technique for Solving Variable Coefficient Variant Boussinesq System. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 6(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2018.6.3.514
Sabali, A. J., Manaa, S. A., & Easif, F. H. (2021). New Successive Approximation Methods for Solving Strongly Nonlinear Jaulent-Miodek Equations. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 9(4), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2021.9.4.869
Sadigh Behzadi, S. (2011). SOLVING SCHR¨ODINGERSCHR¨ SCHR¨ODINGER EQUATION BY USING MODIFIED VARIATIONAL ITERATION AND HOMOTOPY ANALYSIS METHODS. In Journal of Applied Analysis and Computation 1 (4), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.11948/2011029
Sasa, N., & Satsuma, J. (1991). New-type of soliton solutions for a higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 60(2), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.60.409
Sweilam, N. H., & Al-Bar, R. F. (2007). Variational iteration method for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 54(7–8), 993–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.068
Tatari, M., Dehghan, M., & Razzaghi, M. (2007). Application of the Adomian decomposition method for the Fokker-Planck equation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(5–6), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.07.010
Tatari, M., Haghighi, M., & Dehghan, M. (2011). Adomian Decomposition and Variational Iteration Methods for Solving a Problem Arising in Modelling of Biological Species Living Together. In Z. Naturforsch 66(1-2), 93-105. http://znaturforsch.com
Wazwaz, A. M., & Kaur, L. (2019). Optical solitons and Peregrine solitons for nonlinear Schrödinger equation by variational iteration method. Optik, 179, 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.004
Wu, C., Zhang, G., Shi, C., & Feng, B.-F. (2022). General rogue wave solutions to the Sasa-Satsuma equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02210. http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02210
Wu, J. P., & Geng, X. G. (2017). Inverse scattering transform of the coupled sasa-satsuma equation by riemann-hilbert approach. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 67(5), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/67/5/527
* Corresponding author
This is an open access under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)