Evaluating The Usability of Three of The Lowermost Krg/Iraq University Websites in Webometrics Based on User Perspective

Authors

  • Ayub Othman Abdulrahman Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq
  • Karwan Mahdi Hama Rawf Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq
  • Karzan Jaza Gahfoor Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2022.10.2.885

Keywords:

Usability, Websites Usability, User Satisfaction, User Testing, Questionnaire, Usability criteria, Website Evaluation

Abstract

In the higher education sector, web based facilities perform a vital aspect to offer success of an academic institution, due to the users depend on the universities websites to achieve different academic instructions. Simultaneously, users may face many usability difficulties while having access to the websites. For that reason, this research investigates user based testing and questionnaires methods from user perspective to evaluate three of lowermost university websites in KRG/Iraq according to Ranking Web of Universities (webometrics); university of Raparin, university of Garmian, and university of Halabja. Thirty participants contribute to implementing six tasks of user-based methods and ten questions of questionnaire approach. Based on the analysing process, the accuracy of universities websites are; 86.7%, 79.5%, and 61.1% for each University of Raparin, University of Halabja, and University of Garmian respectively. Moreover, user satisfaction for the University of Raparin is 3.59, while 3.24 and 3.01 are the rates of satisfaction for University of Halabja and University of Garmian.

Author Biographies

Ayub Othman Abdulrahman, Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq

Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq (ayub.abdulrahman@uoh.edu.iq)

Karwan Mahdi Hama Rawf, Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq

Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq - (karwan.hamaraouf@uoh.edu.iq)

Karzan Jaza Gahfoor, Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq

Dept. of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Halabja, KRG, Halabja, Iraq - (karzan.ghafor@uoh.edu.iq)

References

[1] Mentes, A.P D.S.A. & A.P.D.A.H. Turan, 2012. Assessing the Usability Of University Websites: An Empirical Study On Namik Kemal University. Tojet, 11(3). [CrossRef]
[2] Jabar M. A., Usman Abbas Usman, Sidi F, 2014. Usability Evaluation of Universities’ Websites: International Journal of Information Processing and Management (IJIPM) 10 Volume 5, Number 1, February 2014 [CrossRef]
[3] Yusof, U. K., Khaw, L. K., Ch'ng, H. Y., & Neow, B. J. (2010, June). Balancing between usability and aesthetics of web design. In Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE. 
 [CrossRef]
[4] Brian Shackel, Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation, Interacting with Computers, Volume 21, Issue 5-6, December 2009, Pages 339–346, [CrossRef]
[5] Zaphiris, P. and Ellis, D.R. (2001) “Website usability and content accessibility of the top USA universities”, Proceedings of the WebNet 2001 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, 1380-1385.
 [CrossRef]
[6] Chiew, T. K., & Salim, S. S. (2003). Webuse: Website usability evaluation tool. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 16(1), 47-57. 
 [CrossRef]
[7] Nielsen J., "Heuristic Evaluation". In J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (Eds.); Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 25- 64, 1994. 

[8] Caglar, E., & S.A. Mentes, 2012. The usability of university websites–a study on European University of Lefke. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 11(1): 22-40. [CrossRef]
[9] ISO (1998) ISO 9241-11: Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on Usability. Geneva: International Standards Organisation. Also available from the British Standards Institute, London. 

[10] Muhammad,A.;Siddique, A.; Naveed, Q.N.; Khaliq, U.; Aseere, A.M.; Hasan, M.A.; Qureshi, M.R.N.; Shahzad, B. Evaluating Usability of Academic Websites through a Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042040 [CrossRef]
[11] Weiqi, H.; Wang, X. (2009) Lund University Website Evaluation: Focus on Homepage and English research Pages. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [CrossRef]
[12] Kostaras, N.; Xenos, M. Assessing Educational Web-site Usability using Heuristic Evaluation Rules. In Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, Patras, Greece, 18–20 May 2007; pp. 543–550.
[CrossRef]
[13] Alotaibi, M.B. Assessing the usability of university websites in Saudi Arabia: A heuristic evaluation approach. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15–17 April 2013; pp. 138–142 [CrossRef]
[14] Luis, C.E.; Galarza, L.J.; Quinche, R.G.; Romero, E.C.; Jaramillo, M.L. Analysis of usability of universities Web portals using the Prometheus tool-SIRIUS. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Democracy e-Government (ICEDEG), Quito, Ecuador, 19–21 April 2017; p. 195. [CrossRef]
[15] Fortune B. Deedam, Enefa-a Thomas, Onate E. Taylor "Accessibility and Usability Evaluation of State-Owned Universities Website in Nigeria", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V56(1),31-36 February 2018. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group [CrossRef]
[16] Erkan, T.E.; Can, G.F.; Turan, E.; Erkan, G.F. Selecting the Best Warehouse Data Collecting System by Using AHP and FAHP Methods. Tehnički vjesnik. 2014, 21, 87–93. 
 [CrossRef]
[17] Rashida, M.; Islam, K.; Kayes, A.S.M.; Hammoudeh, M.; Arefin, M.S.; Habib, M.A. Towards Developing a Framework to Analyze the Qualities of the University Websites. Computers 2021, 10, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers 10050057
[CrossRef]
[18] Sharmistha Roy, Prasant Kumar Pattnaik, Rajib Mall,A quantitative approach to evaluate usability of academic websites based on human perception, Egyptian Informatics Journal, Volume 15, Issue 3, 2014,Pages 159-167,ISSN 1110-8665,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2014.08.002.
[CrossRef]
[19] Marzanah, A.J.; Usman, A.U.; Aisha, A. Assessing the usability of university websites from users’ perspective. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
. 2013, 7, 98–111. 
 [CrossRef]
[20] Li, R.; Sun, T. Assessing Factors for Designing a Successful B2C E-Commerce Website Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS-Grey Methodology. Symmetry 2020, 12, 363. [CrossRef]
[21] Agarwal, P.; Sahai, M.; Mishra, V.; Bag, M.; Singh, V. A review of multi-criteria decision making techniques for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2011, 2, 801–810. 

[CrossRef]
[22] Wahyuningrum, T.; Rokhman, N.; Musdholifah, A. Algorithm Comparison Performance in Assessing the Quality of University Websites. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Media Studies, Hotel Santika Premier, Indonesia, 8–10 November 2017; pp. 19–24. 

[23] Webometrics (2022), “Ranking Web of Universities” [Accessed on January 14, 2022] [CrossRef]

Downloads

Published

2022-04-18

How to Cite

Abdulrahman, A. O., Hama Rawf, K. M., & Gahfoor, K. J. (2022). Evaluating The Usability of Three of The Lowermost Krg/Iraq University Websites in Webometrics Based on User Perspective. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 10(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2022.10.2.885

Issue

Section

Science Journal of University of Zakho