THE EFFICENCY OF A MANUAL CHAINSAW PERFORMING UTILIZATION OPERATIONS OF POPLAR TREES IN ZAKHO, KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2024.12.2.1224Keywords:
Bucking Production, Delimbing, Chainsaw, Felling, Log, Regression model, Time studyAbstract
In Poplar plantations, manual tree harvesting techniques (using chainsaws) are still utilized, especially on gentle terrain or for smaller trees, where automated felling may not be a possible or safe option. The most important variables affecting the productivity of motor-manual felling, a global survey show that terrain slope, understory density, distance to trees, and diameter at breast height (DBH) are the most major variables influencing the productivity of manual tree felling. In harvesting activities like felling, delimbing, and bucking, skilled workers are required. Chainsaw use is associated with timber harvesting activities including felling, delimbing, and bucking in forest areas. The chainsaw felling hourly output was 0.4546 m3/h, the delimbing hourly production was 0.482 m3/h, and the bucking hourly production was 0.753 m3/h. As tree DBH increased, chainsaw productivity also increased. In the present study, the utilization rate and chain saw productivity hours (PMH) were 8.25 hours and 71%, respectively. Regression models' calibration and validation procedures for many aspects of tree utilization were used to develop the mathematical models between the above-mentioned process included in utilization as dependent variables and both DBH and total height of trees as independent variables. The coefficient of determination was used to test the efficiency of the calibration and validation of the developed models in the estimation of the dependent variables, the most acceptable Equation No. 11 with a 91.86 coefficient of determination(R2). Planning for sustainable harvesting can be influenced by the primary suggestions for improving motor-manual felling productivity.
References
Abbasi, E., Lotfalian, M. , Hosseini, S. (2013). Productivity and cost of tree felling crew with a chainsaw in Caspian forests. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2013, 3, 90–97.
Azarnoush, M. R., & Fathi, J. (2014). Efficiency Economic of Chainsaw and Timber Jack 450C Skidder Evaluation in Felling Operation and Ground-Base Skidding System Journal: JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN BIOLOGY Vol 4, No.3
Barokaha, S.M., Matangaranb, J. R., & Santosa, G. (2017). Cost Analysis of Felling with Chainsaw and Skidding with Farm Tractor in KPH Saradan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531
Bas¸kent, E. Z. & Keles¸, S. (2006). Developing alternative wood harvesting strategies with linear programming in preparing forest management plans. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30(1), 67–79.
BehjouK., Majnounian B., Dvořák J, Namiranian M, Saeed A, & Feghhi J.(2009). Productivity and cost of manual felling with a chainsaw in Caspian forests. Journal of Forest Science 2009; 55(2): 96-100.
Björheden R., Apel K., Shiba M., & Thompson M.A. (1995) IUFRO forest work study nomenclature. Swedish University of Agricultural Science Department of Operational Efciency, Garpenberg, p 16
Bjorheden, R. (1991). Basic time concepts for international comparisons of time study reports. Journal of Forest Engineering, 2(2), 3339.
Ciubotaru A. (1998). Exploatarea pădurilor. [Forest Harvesting]. Editura Lux Libris, Braşov, 351 p.
Conway, S. )1982(. Logging practices: principles of timber harvesting systems. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, 432 p.
Garland, J. & Jackson, D. (1997). Felling and Bucking Techniques for Woodland Owners (Issue January); The Woodland Workbook; Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1997.
Huyler, N.K. & LeDoux, C.B. (1997). Cycle-time equation for the Koller K300 cable yarder operating on steep slopes in the Northeast. Res. Paper NE-705. USDA Forest Service. Lortz, D., Kluender, R., McCoy, W., Stokes, B., &Klepac, J., (1997). Manual felling time and productivity in southern forests. Forest Prod J 47(10): 59–63.
Lotfalian M (2012) Forest utilization. Aeizh Press, Tehran, p 488 (in Persian).
Magagnotti N., Spinelli R., Acuna M., Bigot M., Guerra S., Hartsough B., Kanzian C., Kärhä K., Lindroos O., Roux S., Talbot B., Tolosana E., F. & Zormaier ? (2012). Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies, COST Action FP-0902, WG 2 Operations research and measurement methodologies.Fiorentino (FI),
Majnounian B, Jourgholami M, Zobeiri M, &Feghhi J, (2009). Assessment of forest harvesting damage to residual stands and regenerations - a Case Study of Namkhaneh district in Kheyrud forest. Iran J Environ Sci 7(1): 33-44.
Miyata, E. (1980). Determining Fixed and Operating Costs of Logging Equipment.
Olsen, E., Hossain, M., & Miller, M. (1998). Statistical Comparison of Methods Used in Harvesting Work Studies. Forest research Laboratory, Oregon State University, 8 – 21.
Nakagawa T., Kurose T., Hino T., Tanaka K., & Kawamukai M. (2007a). Development of series of Gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J Biosci Bioeng 104: 31–41
Nurminen T., Korpunen H., & Uusitalo J. (2006). Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fenn. 40:335–363. doi:10.14214/sf.346
Rodriguez, E. Otava. (1986). Wood Extraction with Oxen and Agricultural Tractors. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 92p.USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-S 5. l6p.
Rummer, R., &Klepac, J., (2002). Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber? Published in Small Diameter Timber: Resource Management, Manufacturing, and Markets proceedings from conference held. 268 p
Spinelli, R, &Visser, R (2008). ‘Analyzing and Estimating Delays in Harvester Operation”International Journal of Forest Engineering, vol.19 , no.1, pp. 36-41.
Uusitalo, J., Kokko, S., Kivinen, V.P. (2004). The effect of two bucking methods on Scots pine lumber quality. Silva Fenn. 2004, 38, 291–303.
Wang, J., Long, C., McNeel, J., Baumgras, J., (2004). Productivity and cost of manual felling and cable skidding in central Appalachain hardwood forests. Forest Prod J 54(12): 45–51.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammedamin Taha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online.